«
»

If a Congressman votes to close Abu Ghraib and house detainees in the U.S?

Should there vote be recognized as their acceptance to use their State as the place to keep these terrorists?

If this is the case how many Congressmen would still vote to close and use U.S. prisons for these detainees?

Is it fair to tell Congress that their vote means they will accept these people?

Colorado already houses maximimum security prisoners including terrorists.

This entry was posted on Friday, October 23rd, 2009 at 6:21 pm and is filed under abu ghraib. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “If a Congressman votes to close Abu Ghraib and house detainees in the U.S?”

  1. Cut Throat *itch (2) on October 23rd, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    Colorado already houses maximimum security prisoners including terrorists.
    References :

  2. Abu Ghraib is in Iraq, now under the control of the Iraqi government. Congress can no more vote to close it down than the Iraqi government could vote to shut San Quentin prison.
    References :

  3. All Knowing One on October 24th, 2009 at 12:16 am

    no one has ever escaped from our Max security prisons. Not even once. Stop being such a coward.
    References :

  4. Well, I guess you’re a little behind on your news. They already voted it down yesterday. It makes no sense, but there ya go. I hear no complaints about serial killers being held in a prison in your neighborhood. if you are so afraid that terrorists will escape, why not the serial killer? This was a Republican campaign to frighten people into believing that it was OK to keep Guantanamo open, in spite of the fact that it creates such a good recruiting poster for terrorists, both elsewhere and, as we discovered last night, here.
    References :

Leave a Reply